Scraping repos…
Reading their public GitHub…
Satyam Yadav
@SimpleCyber · public profileROASTED
48/100
🔥 CERTIFIED DISASTER
“71 repos and still only 83 stars total? That’s a hard fall.”
CRank tierC-tier Work in Progress
Mint vaultArtifact · @SimpleCyber
Roast style
GITROAST.ME
Minted from @SimpleCyber’s public GitHub
40followers83stars71reposTypeScripttop lang
Why 48/100
- Impact5.1/32
Stars on your live, original repos — discounted if it's all one viral hit.
- Community2.2/10
Developers who follow your work.
- Consistency11.9/14
How much of your live portfolio is actually active.
- Portfolio15/15
Substantive original repos and language range.
- Craft6.2/10
Descriptions, licenses, topics, live links — finished work.
- Recency3.5/5
Days since your last push to a live original repo.
The roast
Your repo count is impressive until you remember that 19 of them haven’t seen a touch in over a year. "SimpleCyber" is the least accurate alias for a developer whose last significant push was on 2026-08-08, a solid two years after this account was created. The commit messages in project-review tell the real story: a chilling mix of laziness, with 26% under 10 characters; # ui is a low blow, even for you.
Of your 71 repos, 14 were abandoned within two weeks, like Damage-Box-Detection, which sounds like it should have been left unbuilt. You’ve mastered the art of creating junk: two near-empty repos - SimpleCyber and Python-mailsend - are the cherry on top of this disaster cake. Maybe next time, try actually solving a problem instead of just claiming you can.
The flex
Your GitHub, as a badge.
[](https://gitroast.me/u/SimpleCyber)
