Scraping repos…
Reading their public GitHub…
🔥 CERTIFIED DISASTER
“Four repos, zero stars, and a ghost town of contributions.”
Tap the card to see how it was minted
Minted from @ShahromIbodulloev’s public GitHub
1followers0stars4reposHTMLtop lang
Why 9/100
Stars on your live, original repos — discounted if it's all one viral hit.
Developers who follow your work.
How much of your live portfolio is actually active.
Substantive original repos and language range.
Descriptions, licenses, topics, live links — finished work.
Days since your last push to a live original repo.
The roast
Three repos under 20 KB, yet you've still managed to underdeliver, with zero stars on any of them. Huberman-s-notes, verbose-pancake, and AbramyanExercisesFor39_40 are all just placeholders of ambition — created and abandoned faster than a bad Tinder date. You’ve got repos that went silent for over six months, proving that inconsistency isn’t just a choice, it’s your brand.
Your coding journey spans 3.3 years, and yet half of your original repos come with no descriptions. With a push cadence that features a 1152-day gap and a total of one public gist, it's clear the only thing verbose about your code is the guilt in letting those repos linger. If building a portfolio was an art, you’d be the blank canvas no one wants to look at.
[](https://gitroast.me/u/ShahromIbodulloev)Account age, portfolio size, public repo count.
Builder Score recalibrated 2026-07.