Scraping repos…
Reading their public GitHub…
🔥 CERTIFIED DISASTER
“4 stars across 16 repos — a vanity project with more ghosts than followers.”
Tap the card to see how it was minted
Minted from @sabr2007’s public GitHub
0followers4stars16reposPythontop lang
Why 30/100
Stars on your live, original repos — discounted if it's all one viral hit.
Developers who follow your work.
How much of your live portfolio is actually active.
Substantive original repos and language range.
Descriptions, licenses, topics, live links — finished work.
Days since your last push to a live original repo.
The roast
Your most ambitious project, neural-Inbox1, is impressive on paper with its AI aspirations, but it’s still just a whisper among the crickets. Speaking of echoes, 67% of your repos flaunt no descriptions at all, so nobody knows if they’re meant to be deadly serious or just a joke. You’ve launched four repos that barely survived two weeks—projects like transcriber_v2, which vanished faster than your motivation, leaving a trail of digital dust.
The commit messages in sabr2007 read like a cry for help: half under 10 characters and the worst of the bunch is a literal dash. With 15 original repos and a shockingly low push cadence, it’s astonishing you’ve managed zero followers; the only thing less popular than your work is your bio-less profile. At this point, 4 stars for your efforts is laughable—almost as funny as naming a repo "staleness-monitor-v2" when your entire account screams abandonment.
It’s clear: you can play with AI, but when it comes to real commitment, the longest gap between pushes was 130 days. With that level of engagement, you might as well archive everything and pivot to ghost-writing. Your Builder Score of 30/100 is a clear sign: you’ve graduated into a tutorial ghost town, and the only thing scarier than your code is your commitment to it.
[](https://gitroast.me/u/sabr2007)Account age, portfolio size, public repo count.
Builder Score recalibrated 2026-07.