Scraping repos…
Reading their public GitHub…
@doaoww · public profileROASTED
25/100
🔥 CERTIFIED DISASTER
“One star for 16 repos, and that’s generous for copy-paste projects.”
DRank tierD-tier Tutorial Graduate
Mint vaultArtifact · @doaoww
Roast style
KAZAKHSTAN
GITROAST.ME
Minted from @doaoww’s public GitHub
1followers1stars17reposTypeScripttop lang
Why 25/100
- Impact0.3/32
Stars on your live, original repos — discounted if it's all one viral hit.
- Community0.2/10
Developers who follow your work.
- Consistency14/14
How much of your live portfolio is actually active.
- Portfolio2.4/15
Substantive original repos and language range.
- Craft0.7/10
Descriptions, licenses, topics, live links — finished work.
- Recency5/5
Days since your last push to a live original repo.
The roast
You’ve got 17 repos, and somehow only one managed to scrape a single star. Exactly zero of your 16 original repos have descriptions, making it a guessing game for anyone brave enough to browse. The crown jewel here, 'my-test-project', is the poster child for uninspired naming — a project that screams ‘I couldn't be arsed.’
Dead on arrival — ‘Sana’ was created and abandoned within two weeks, collecting dust for over six months now. You maintain 53 runtime dependencies in 'micro-lender-ai', so the only thing micro here is your ability to curate a clean project. With a long push gap of 36 days between your repo updates, it's no wonder your GitHub Builder Score lands at a dismal 25/100 — it's clear you’re still learning how to spell 'commit'.
The flex
Your GitHub, as a badge.
[](https://gitroast.me/u/doaoww)
