Scraping repos…
Reading their public GitHub…
🔥 CERTIFIED TUTORIAL GRADUATE
“Five years in, 5 stars is a solid indicator of a dead portfolio.”
Tap the card to see how it was minted
Minted from @Alinazavrr’s public GitHub
5followers5stars22reposPythontop lang
Why 28/100
Stars on your live, original repos — discounted if it's all one viral hit.
Developers who follow your work.
How much of your live portfolio is actually active.
Substantive original repos and language range.
Descriptions, licenses, topics, live links — finished work.
Days since your last push to a live original repo.
The roast
You’ve managed to accumulate 22 public repos over five years, but it’s telling that 9 of them haven’t seen a touch in over a year. Not a single repo has a description, and the closest thing to a star is the zero from your own username repo. Your mining project, 'minesweeper-academy,' is just a sad grab for attention with only 2 stars — the majority of the JavaScript and TypeScript experiments have flopped harder than a one-week course project.
You’ve crammed 7 languages into 21 repos, yet the star count is a pitiful testament to your output: 2 for JavaScript, 2 for TypeScript, and a staggering 0 for the rest. Those near-empty repos, like 'kitchen-utensils' and 'python-practice-2,' should be submitted to the Museum of Abandonment. With a 322-day gap in your push cadence, you're dedicating less time coding than most people spend deciding what to order for lunch.
At 28/100, your Builder Score isn’t just a grade; it's an indictment of five years of lethargy. Honestly, with that output, maybe the real challenge is just getting started — not even the AI wants to coach you anymore.
[](https://gitroast.me/u/Alinazavrr)Account age, portfolio size, public repo count.
Builder Score recalibrated 2026-07.