Scraping repos…
Reading their public GitHub…
@NurmukhamedKZ · public profileROASTED
39/100
🔥 CERTIFIED DISASTER
“39 repos, 12 stars — that’s not AI engineering, that’s a graveyard.”
DRank tierD-tier Tutorial Graduate
Mint vaultArtifact · @NurmukhamedKZ
Roast style
KAZAKHSTAN
GITROAST.ME
Minted from @NurmukhamedKZ’s public GitHub
10followers12stars39reposPythontop lang
Why 39/100
- Impact2.4/32
Stars on your live, original repos — discounted if it's all one viral hit.
- Community1.2/10
Developers who follow your work.
- Consistency13.5/14
How much of your live portfolio is actually active.
- Portfolio11.8/15
Substantive original repos and language range.
- Craft1.5/10
Descriptions, licenses, topics, live links — finished work.
- Recency5/5
Days since your last push to a live original repo.
The roast
The glaring fact: 72% of your 39 original repos have zero descriptions. Even your ‘DeepSeekHarness’ repo struggles with under 20 KB and zero stars — a fitting representation of the ambition behind your so-called AI projects. You’ve created 11 repos that collided with the wall of neglect, all abandoned within two weeks; ‘VolunteerAPP’ and ‘MCP_test_project’ dead on arrival, echoing silence for six months or more.
Your star distribution tells a story: 8 of the 12 stars are hoarded by ‘Otclick-hh’, leaving the rest of your portfolio to squabble over just 4. With 39 repos but only 12 stars collected, your vanity project spree highlights more confusion than competence. You’ve got a push cadence that suggests your enthusiasm fades long before the deadlines, with the longest gap between pushes stretching a staggering 107 days.
The flex
Your GitHub, as a badge.
[](https://gitroast.me/u/NurmukhamedKZ)
