Scraping repos…
Reading their public GitHub…
🔥 CERTIFIED TUTORIAL GRADUATE
“Three stars in nine months — even a toddler puts out better work than this.”
Tap the card to see how it was minted
Minted from @merkhanov’s public GitHub
14followers3stars8reposTypeScripttop lang
Why 20/100
Stars on your live, original repos — discounted if it's all one viral hit.
Developers who follow your work.
How much of your live portfolio is actually active.
Substantive original repos and language range.
Descriptions, licenses, topics, live links — finished work.
Days since your last push to a live original repo.
The roast
With just three stars spread across eight repos, 'merkhanov' feels less like a developer and more like a placeholder. The most substantial repo, 'nix-dotfiles', is 20KB of unreadable configuration, and it’s the crown jewel — the others sit empty and directionless. A commit history reflecting only 60% activity in the last 90 days shows a push cadence more suited for hibernation than development.
The real kicker? 80% of your original repos lack any kind of description, meaning even you don't know what you were trying to build. The longest gap between pushes was 82 days — you could write a novel in that time, yet here we are with 'ai-shell-autocompletion' achieving a glorious zero stars. It's been a year, yet you're maintaining a robust output of nothing. Emerging from a year with a Builder Score of 20/100, it’s clear that 'merkhanov' isn’t just a name — it’s a commitment to irrelevance.
[](https://gitroast.me/u/merkhanov)Account age, portfolio size, public repo count.
Builder Score recalibrated 2026-07.