Scraping repos…
Reading their public GitHub…
🔥 GRAVEYARD OF ABANDONMENT
“395 repos logged, but your commit messages are a cry for help.”
Tap the card to see how it was minted
Minted from @Rich-Harris’s public GitHub
21Kfollowers20Kstars395reposJavaScripttop lang
Why 65/100
Stars on your live, original repos — discounted if it's all one viral hit.
Developers who follow your work.
How much of your live portfolio is actually active.
Substantive original repos and language range.
Descriptions, licenses, topics, live links — finished work.
Days since your last push to a live original repo.
The roast
After 15 years, your GitHub is a digital graveyard with 63 repos untouched for over a year. You’ve got 29 projects that were created and abandoned in under two weeks, yet you still think "local-storage-test" deserves a place in the sun. Your commit messages in 'degit' read like a toddler's vocabulary—33% under 10 characters. Lazy one-worders like "oops" won’t cut it when you have 20159 stars to your name and a 4% push rate in the last 90 days.
Then there's 'packd,' which sits ignored with 61 open issues and your only archived repo, virtually a monument to neglect. You’ve got the stars, but your push cadence screams indecision, with the longest gap between pushes at 139 days. After 395 repos, it's clear your definition of progress is more about collecting than coding. Can someone please explain to your followers that aesthetic is not substitute for activity?
[](https://gitroast.me/u/Rich-Harris)Account age, portfolio size, public repo count.
Builder Score recalibrated 2026-07.